Advertisement
Research Article| Volume 10, ISSUE 2, P380-386, March 2019

Current status and challenges of Additive manufacturing in orthopaedics: An overview

      Abstract

      Additive manufacturing is a rapidly emerging technology which is being successfully implemented in the various field of medicine as well as in orthopaedics, where it has applications in reducing cartilage defects and treatments of bones. The technology helps through systematic collection of information about the shape of the "defects" and precise fabrication of complex 3D constructs such as cartilage, heart valve, trachea, myocardial bone tissue and blood vessels. In this paper, a large number of the relevant research papers on the additive manufacturing and its application in medical specifically orthopaedics are identified through Scopus had been studied using Bibliometric analysis and application analysis is undertaken. The bibliometric analysis shows that there is an increasing trend in the research reports on additive manufacturing applications in the field of orthopaedics. Discussions are on using technological advancement like scanning techniques and various challenges of the orthopaedic being met by additive manufacturing technology. For patient-specific orthopaedic applications, these techniques incorporate clinical practice and use for effective planning. 3D printed models printed by this technology are accepted for orthopaedic surgery such as revision of lumbar discectomy, pelvic surgery and large scapular osteochondroma. The applications of additive manufacturing in orthopaedics will experience a rapid translation in future. An orthopaedic surgeon can convert need/idea into a reality by using computer-aided design (CAD) software, analysis software to facilitate the manufacturing. Thus, AM provides a comprehensive opportunity to manufacture orthopaedic implantable medical devices.

      Keywords

      1. Introduction

      Applications of AM have become prevalent in various medical areas. Researchers and surgeons increasingly use this technology for fabricating of complex implant that is helpful for medical as well as in orthopaedics. Patient's anatomy is represented by a three-dimensional virtual model which can be easily obtained from different scanning techniques and printed by Additive manufacturing technology. The fabrications of these implants were previously just prohibitive by using subtractive manufacturing methods. 3D printed model gives a better understanding of complex pathology and anatomy of patients which is also suitable for surgical training.
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: a review.
      ,
      • Wong K.C.
      3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics.
      It is also a method of prototyping of personalised instrumentation for traumatology and orthopaedic surgery
      • Vaish A.
      • Vaish R.
      3D printing and its applications in orthopedics.
      .
      AM is used in surgical fields such as orthopaedic surgery, preoperative evaluation, diagnosis, operative planning and paediatric surgery. AM is suitable for maxillofacial surgery as ceramic, and metal powder can be used for the fabrication of personalised prostheses. This technology is continuously improving the manufactured parts as it focuses on the utilisation and has great ability to incorporate scaffolds. The main advantages of AM are the reduction of surgery time and improved medical outcome. Currently, this technology is available for surgical planning of orthopaedic procedure. However, in case of individual patient histories, there is a shortfall of standardised orthopaedic solutions and is costly & time-consuming. By the application of AM, these problems are identified in relatively lesser time and with lower cost.
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: a literature-based review.
      In medical there is a requirement of innovation for clinicians and scientists.
      • Vaishya R.
      • Lal H.
      Learn through innovation, research and publication.
      It allows the designing and fabrication of customised prosthetic implants that as per the specific requirement of the patient, like shape, size and mechanical properties of the implant. AM helps in reducing design and manufacturing time because implant pattern is scanned with Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and Computer tomography (CT). It solves the various problem of orthopaedics where standard implants cannot fulfil the individual requirement of the patient. Previous the implants were modified manually by the surgeon to make them fit for the patient.
      • Salmi M.
      • Tuomi J.
      • Paloheimo K.S.
      • Björkstrand R.
      • Paloheimo M.
      • Salo J.
      • Kontio R.
      • Mesimäki K.
      • Mäkitie A.A.
      Patient-specific reconstruction with 3D modeling and DMLS additive manufacturing.
      It is also professionally used in various other specialities such as neurosurgery, plastic surgery, oncology, craniofacial and dentistry.
      In medical usually, four additive manufacturing technologies are being used, these include stereolithography (SLA), selective laser sintering (SLS), fused deposition modelling (FDM) and electron beam melting (EBM). By the application of these technologies the structural parameters, like the diameter of pore, porosity and Interconnectivity can be precisely controlled to maintain the proliferation, adhesion and differentiation of cells.
      • Javaid M.
      • Kumar L.
      • Kumar V.
      • Haleem A.
      Product design and development using polyjet Rapid prototyping technology.
      In cardiothoracic surgery, 3D printed patient-specific model are for pre-operative simulation; such as complex aortic arch obstruction, tracheoesophageal fistula model, lung vasculature model and hypoplastic aortic arch model. In transplant surgery, a 3D printed patient model has been used for planning & simulating kidney and lobar lung transplantation. Before lobar lung transplantation, the model donor and recipient pulmonary vasculature are printed by the application of this technology. In transplantation of kidney, pelvic cavity replica can also be printed easily.
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: a literature-based review.
      ,
      • Hoang D.
      • Perrault D.
      • Stevanovic M.
      • Ghiassi A.
      Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started.

      2. Advancement of additive manufacturing

      Additive manufacturing is a rapidly emerging technology that is used successfully in the various field of medical, like cartilage defects reduction and treatments of bones. The information about the shape of the defects is collected and is used to fabricate complex 3D constructs such as cartilage, heart valve, trachea, myocardial bone tissue and blood vessels. It can overcome some challenges of engineering as encountered in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine fields. Additive manufacturing is used to develop and manufacture scaffolds for tissue engineering as per the various requirements including porosity, biodegradability and biocompatibility at the exact shape.
      • Salmi M.
      • Tuomi J.
      • Paloheimo K.S.
      • Björkstrand R.
      • Paloheimo M.
      • Salo J.
      • Kontio R.
      • Mesimäki K.
      • Mäkitie A.A.
      Patient-specific reconstruction with 3D modeling and DMLS additive manufacturing.
      ,
      • Horn T.J.
      • Harrysson O.L.A.
      • West H.A.
      • Little J.P.
      • Marcellin-Little D.J.
      Development of a patient-specific bone analog for the biomechanical evaluation of custom implants.
      The printing of bone regeneration scaffolds which are accurately made up of calcium phosphate and collagen. It is used for the construction of vascularised cell-laden and cartilaginous tissues that contains hyaluronic acid and chondrocytes. This technology has demonstrated the ability for the fabrication of scaffolds with multiple cells and biomaterials. It is a powerful tool that reconstructs organ and tissue structures after some injury. It fulfils difficult challenges and easily obtains the shape of defects; fabricate customised from hydrogel and synthesising appropriate biomaterials.
      • Costello J.P.
      • Olivieri L.J.
      • Krieger A.
      • Thabit O.
      • Marshall M.B.
      • Yoo S.J.
      • Kim P.C.
      • Jonas R.A.
      • Nath D.S.
      Utilizing Three-dimensional printing technology to assess the feasibility of High-fidelity synthetic ventricular septal defect models for simulation in medical education.
      ,
      • Lee V.
      • Singh G.
      • Trasatti J.P.
      • Bjornsson C.
      • Xu X.
      • Tran T.N.
      • Yoo S.S.
      • Dai G.
      • Karande P.
      Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting.

      3. Techniques, process and materials used in different additive manufacturing technologies

      Additive manufacturing technologies offer different materials with different flexibilities, colour, density, durability, texture, and tensile strength. AM technologies can print craniofacial bone models, providing a 3D printed tactile sensation of human bone. Various processes and materials that are used commonly in additive manufacturing technologies with their medical use are listed in Table 1.
      Table 1Additive manufacturing technologies techniques, process, materials, layer thickness with medical applications.
      S. NoAM techniquesProcessMaterialsMedical applicationLayer thicknessReferences
      1Stereolithography (SLA)It uses the application of ultraviolet laser inside a vat of resinAcrylate photopolymer

      Plastic

      Glass

      Ceramic

      Epoxy resin
      Anatomical model

      Prosthetics
      0.002mmZhou et al.
      • Zhou C.
      • Chen Y.
      • Yang Z.
      • Khoshnevis B.
      Digital material fabrication using mask image projection based stereolithography.
      ; Bens et al.
      • Bens A.
      • Seitz H.
      • Bermes G.
      • Emons M.
      • Pansky A.
      • Roitzheim B.
      • Tobiasch E.
      • Tille C.
      Non toxic flexible photopolymers for medical stereolithography technology.
      2Selective laser sintering (SLS)Sintering is done by the application of CO2 laser

      A fine thermoplastic powder like nylon or polycarbonate is used to form model layer by layer
      Ceramic

      Thermoplastics

      Powder

      Plastic

      Metals
      Human anatomy

      Customised implants for training
      0.060 mm to 0.150 mmSing et al.
      • Sing S.L.
      • Yeong W.Y.
      • Wiria F.E.
      • Tay B.Y.
      • Zhao Z.
      • Zhao L.
      • Tian Z.
      • Yang S.
      Direct selective laser sintering and melting of ceramics: a review.
      ; Deckers et al.
      • Deckers J.P.
      • Shahzad K.
      • Cardon L.
      • Rombouts M.
      • Vleugels J.
      • Kruth J.P.
      Shaping ceramics through indirect selective laser sintering.
      3Electron Beam Melting (EBM)Powerful electron beam used to built layer by layer metal powder by command of CAD model with exact geometryMetal powder

      Titanium
      Fabrication of implant0.050- 0.200 mmWysocki et al.
      • Wysocki B.
      • Maj P.
      • Sitek R.
      • Buhagiar P.
      • Kurzydłowski K.J.
      • Swieszkowski W.
      Laser and electron beam additive manufacturing methods of fabricating titanium bone implants.
      ; Gibbon and Hansell,
      • Gibbons G.J.
      • Hansell R.G.
      Direct tool steel injection mould inserts through the arcam EBM free form fabrication process.
      4Direct metal laser sintering (DMLS)This technique is similar to SLS where the application of laser does sintering of metal powderTitanium

      Cobalt

      Aluminium

      Bronze alloy

      Steel

      Stainless steel

      Nickel alloy
      Manufacturing of prostheses or implants

      Dental Crowns
      0.0008-0.0016 mmSalmi et al.
      • Salmi M.
      • Tuomi J.
      • Paloheimo K.S.
      • Björkstrand R.
      • Paloheimo M.
      • Salo J.
      • Kontio R.
      • Mesimäki K.
      • Mäkitie A.A.
      Patient-specific reconstruction with 3D modeling and DMLS additive manufacturing.
      ; Gale and Chuhan,
      • Gale J.
      • Achuhan A.
      Application of ultrasonic peening during DMLS production of 316L stainless steel and its effect on material behavior.
      5Laminated Object Manufacturing (LOM)3D model fabricated by adding layers of the defined sheet of materialsMetal

      Plastic

      Paper
      Customised joint replacement Prosthesis0.1mmKechagias,
      • Kechagias J.
      An experimental investigation of the surface roughness of parts produced by LOM process.
      ; Park et al.
      • Park J.
      • Tari M.J.
      • Hahn H.T.
      Characterization of the laminated object manufacturing (LOM) process.
      6Fused deposition modelling (FDM)The process is similar to extrusion, where a heated thermoplastic material is added layer by layer to fabricate a modelpolycarbonate

      Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS)

      polypropylene

      Wax

      polyesters
      Pharmaceutical

      Drug delivery device

      Helpful for maxillofacial surgery
      0.005- 0.010 mmArmillotta et al.
      • Armillotta A.
      • Bianchi S.
      • Cavallaro M.
      • Minnella S.
      Edge quality in fused deposition modeling: II. experimental verification.
      ; Singh,
      • Singh R.
      Some investigations for small sized product fabrication with FDM for plastic components.
      7Inkjet 3D printingUse different fluid fluids such as polymer solution provided in the form of liquid and deposited layer by layer to built a productPower

      Liquid binder
      Medical education

      Surgical planning
      0.087mmGua et al.
      • Guo Y.
      • Patanwala H.S.
      • Bognet B.
      • Ma A.W.K.
      Inkjet and inkjet-based 3D printing: connecting fluid properties and printing performance.


      Yang et al.
      • Yang M.
      • Lv X.
      • Liu X.
      • Zhang J.
      Research on color 3D printing based on color adherence.
      ; Mancanares et al.
      • Mancanares C.G.
      • Zancul E.D.S.
      • Silva J.C.D.
      • Miguel P.A.C.
      Additive manufacturing process selection based on parts’ selection criteria.
      8Polyjet 3D printingProduction is done through a UV-curable acrylic plastic

      Uses various types of printing materials, and its post-processing stage is straightforward.
      PhotopolymersOrthopaedic implant

      Preclinical Testing

      Anatomical models
      0.00065mmMoore and Williams,
      • Moore J.P.
      • Williams C.B.
      Fatigue properties of parts printed by PolyJet material jetting.
      ; Javaid et al.
      • Javaid M.
      • Kumar L.
      • Kumar V.
      • Haleem A.
      Product design and development using polyjet Rapid prototyping technology.
      9Colour-Jet-Printing (CJP)Part is built by spreading material in the layer, over the build platform using a roller

      Printing head jets layer of binder on the material layer
      Gypsum powder

      Binder
      Full-colour implants of heart0.003-0.004mmYang et al.
      • Yang M.
      • Lv X.
      • Liu X.
      • Zhang J.
      Research on color 3D printing based on color adherence.
      ; Mancanares et al.
      • Mancanares C.G.
      • Zancul E.D.S.
      • Silva J.C.D.
      • Miguel P.A.C.
      Additive manufacturing process selection based on parts’ selection criteria.
      10Multi-Jet PrintingNozzles are used to spray binding of liquid onto metallic powder or ceramic to create a solid thin layer

      After production of the model, it must be sintered in the furnace to increase the strength
      Powder

      Plastics
      Orthopaedics

      Dental
      0.016mmKan and Yuen,
      • Kan C.W.
      • Yuen C.W.M.
      Digital ink-jet printing on textiles.
      ;

      El-Wahab et al.
      • El-Wahab H.A.
      • El-Molla M.M.
      • Lin L.
      Preparation and characterisation of ink formulations for jet printing on nylon carpet.
      The properties of the raw material and layer thickness have a significant impact on the quality of product/implant produced. Appropriate quality of raw material creates a product with higher mechanical strength. If layer thickness is decreased, the parts printed through these technologies give better surface finish and mechanical strength.

      4. Benefits of additive manufacturing in medical

      Additive manufacturing fabricates custom implants of any complex shape and in the exact geometric feature, which is not previously possible by using traditional manufacturing techniques. Various benefits of additive manufacturing are as under:
      • It gives perfect-fit production of a patient-specific implant
      • During implant manufacturing, offers unlimited geometric freedom.
      • Used to generate free-form scaffold of an individual patient
      • Precise setting of desired elasticity
      • Precise setting of grid structures/surface roughness
      • High bio-compatibility
      • It quickly creates a bone defect
      • Manufacture of the parts in one shot
      • Faster availability and shorter build times
      • Fully automated and digitised manufacturing
      • Cost savings and resource conservation
      • Overall improvement with economies of scale and cost saving
      • Potential to reduce the stiffness mismatch at junctions of bone–implant and minimised the porosity.
      • Allows biomechanical evaluation of the design of specific patient under specific loading conditions to the actual implant fabrication.

      5. Research status on additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics

      Extensive research is done in the area of AM applications in orthopaedics. Scopus database is used to identify the research articles related to this area; here we have identified 181 research articles about this area. The first paper published on additive manufacturing was in 2000. Here we show data from 2007 to 2017. In the year 2007, there were only two research articles published in this area, and it has now increased to 68 in 2017. Fig. 1 shows year-wise publications on additive manufacturing from 2007 to 2017.
      Fig. 1
      Fig. 1Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: Year-wise publications (Source: Scopus).
      There is a sustained increase of articles related to additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics. The details of the papers published in different journals on orthopaedics through the application of this technology. Fig. 2 shows the top five journals publish research articles in this area. Out of top five, Chinese Journal of tissue engineering research have highest publications of 14. Materials science and engineering: C and Techniques in orthopaedics have four publications each is at position 2 and 3. Orthopaedic Surgery and Rapid Prototyping Journal both have the equal number of publications, i.e. three are ranked fourth and fifth respectively and presents a large contribution by tissue engineering research.
      Fig. 2
      Fig. 2Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics (Source: Scopus).
      Fig. 3 shows the area-wise research on additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics; It observes that medicine have maximum utilisation (31%) of this technology mainly in the field of orthopaedics; whereas engineering fields contribute 23%, material science contribute 16%, and biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology contribute 10%. The diverse application of AM in areas of physics & astronomy (5%), computer science (3%), chemical engineering (3%) and others area (9%) which includes chemistry, dentistry, pharmacology, toxicology and pharmaceutics, health professions, mathematics, neuroscience, immunology and microbiology, agricultural and biological sciences and energy.
      Fig. 3
      Fig. 3Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: Area-wise contributions (Source: Scopus).
      From Scopus data, it is analysed that applications of additive manufacturing are increasing in the area of orthopaedics. Thus these technologies/machines are becoming commercially viable and acceptable in the field of orthopaedics.

      6. Devices used to capture data to make implant by additive manufacturing in orthopaedics

      AM produce customised patient-specific implants with the help of computerised tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and 3D scanner. DICOM software is used to converts patient (CT, MRI) scan data into 3D files or we can use a 3D scanner to take patient data and print using additive manufacturing technologies. But the main limitation of the 3D scanner over CT and MRI scan is that 3D scanner can measure outer body surface, whereas CT and MRI provide information about hard/soft tissue structure.
      CT scan: A CT scan sends X-ray beam to the body that moves through an arc and captures many pictures. It is used for imaging and collected data of hard tissue like bone. It takes fewer minutes because sometimes radiation scan is unsuitable for the patient
      • Vaish A.
      • Vaish R.
      3D printing and its applications in orthopedics.
      .
      MRI scan: It uses a powerful magnet to align nuclei atoms inside the body. It provides clear information of normal and abnormal tissue as compared to CT scan. It uses powerful magnetic field and radio frequency pulses to achieve the detailed picture of soft tissues, bone, organs and other internal structure of the body. It is also useful to obtain an accurate diagnosis. It cannot take a longer time to complete the scan.
      • Vaishya R.
      • Vijaya V.
      • Krishnan B.M.
      • Agarwala A.K.
      Fallacies of CT based component size prediction in total knee arthroplasty – are patient-specific instruments the answer?.
      ,
      • Srivastava A.
      • Aggarwal A.N.
      • Mishra P.
      • Bhateja D.
      Femoral fracture acting as an “ominous masquerade’’ in a 7-year-old child.
      3D scanning: 3 D scanning is used to scan outer surface of object/ patient body in the form of a point cloud or a triangle mesh and generate a 3D surface. It captures data of the outer surface of the body such as skin which is difficult to measure precisely by CT and MRI scanning and have extensive applications
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: a literature-based review.
      .

      7. Challenges of additive manufacturing in orthopaedics

      AM technologies can print multiple types of material and different colours which are helpful for doctors and surgeon towards analysing the defects. This technology reduces product development time & the cost and improves communication between surgeon and the patient. AM meet various challenges in orthopaedics are discussed in following Table 2.
      Table 2Challenges of Additive Manufacturing in Orthopaedics.
      S. NoChallengesDescriptionReferences
      1Facilitate surgery designCT and MRI scan are used to create 3D images of bones and fabricate bones by using additive manufacturing technologies

      Useful for presentation, teaching and surgical design

      Technology is used efficiently for reverse engineering techniques such as missing parts

      Applied for custom made prosthesis

      Doctors have now used this technique for medical education and facilitate complex surgery design
      Cai
      • Cai H.
      Application of 3D printing in orthopedics: status quo and opportunities in China.
      ; Verma et al.
      • Verma T.
      • Sharma A.
      • Sharma A.
      • Maini L.
      Customized iliac prosthesis for reconstruction in giant cell tumour: a unique treatment approach.
      ; Lal et al.
      • Lal H.
      • Kumar L.
      • Kumar R.
      • Boruah T.
      • Jindal P.K.
      • Sabharwal V.K.
      Inserting pedicle screws in lumbar spondylolisthesis – the easy bone conserving way.
      2Orthopaedics metal implantsAM technologies such as Direct Metal Laser printing (DMLS) can also produce metal implants

      The main advantages of DMLS are to offer both macro and microstructural scales personalised implants.
      Salmi et al.
      • Salmi M.
      • Tuomi J.
      • Paloheimo K.S.
      • Björkstrand R.
      • Paloheimo M.
      • Salo J.
      • Kontio R.
      • Mesimäki K.
      • Mäkitie A.A.
      Patient-specific reconstruction with 3D modeling and DMLS additive manufacturing.
      ; Morrison et al.
      • Morrison R.J.
      • Kashlan K.N.
      • Flanangan C.L.
      • Wright J.K.
      • Green G.E.
      • Hollister S.J.
      • Weatherwax K.J.
      Regulatory considerations in the design and manufacturing of implantable 3D-printed medical devices.
      3Multi-material printsDifferent AM technologies are available to print a 3D model of multi-materials.

      Models represent a different section of bone, soft tissue and organ which provide a clear understanding of the patient body and helpful for training of medical students.
      Yap et al.
      • Yap Y.L.
      • Tan Y.S.E.
      • Tan H.K.J.
      • Peh Z.K.
      • Low X.Y.
      • Yeong W.Y.
      • Tan C.S.H.
      • Laude H.
      3D printed bio-models for medical applications.
      ; Javaid and Haleem,
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: a literature-based review.
      4ProstheticsEasily create artificial device/model which easily replaces missing body part lost by accident or other diseases

      Prosthetic manufactured by this technology has the ability to intended normal function in the body

      Produces prosthetic which perfectly match with used anatomy

      Technology manufactured customised, low-cost prosthetics such as artificial leg which improve human comfort
      Vaish and Vaish,
      • Vaish A.
      • Vaish R.
      3D printing and its applications in orthopedics.
      ; Chung et al.
      • Chung K.J.
      • Hong-do Y.
      • Kim Y.T.
      • Yang I.
      • Park Y.W.
      • Kim H.N.
      Preshaping plates for minimally invasive fixation of calcaneal fractures using a real-size 3D-printed model as a preoperative and intraoperative tool.
      5Lead timeOne of the challenges of AM is to create iterate design and prototype that reduce time to market

      This technology can speed up the design improvements of any medical devices by analysing feedback from doctors and the surgeons

      It supports clinical trials by optimising the design of medical instruments.
      Cohen et al.
      • Cohen A.
      • Laviv A.
      • Berman P.
      • Nashef R.
      • Abu-Tair J.
      Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology.
      ; Horn et al.
      • Horn T.J.
      • Harrysson O.L.A.
      • West H.A.
      • Little J.P.
      • Marcellin-Little D.J.
      Development of a patient-specific bone analog for the biomechanical evaluation of custom implants.
      6Instruments designingEffective design and development of instruments that simplify the surgical procedure improve the accuracy of the alignment and shorten the operative time

      The applications of AM based instruments for orthopaedics, spinal surgery and trauma

      Uses effectively to achieve clinical practices
      Rose et al.
      • Rose A.S.
      • Webster C.E.
      • Harrysson O.L.
      • Formeister E.J.
      • Rawal R.B.
      • Iseli C.E.
      Pre-operative simulation of pediatric mastoid surgery with 3D-printed temporal bone models.
      ; Vaish and Vaish,
      • Vaish A.
      • Vaish R.
      3D printing and its applications in orthopedics.
      7Innovative ideas for the surgeonAM impact on the orthopaedic field where surgeons and doctors use 3D printed or bone model to train students

      Suitable for the patient to explain in detail of surgery and surgeon can also practice before the actual surgery which gives innovative ideas
      Costello et al.
      • Costello J.P.
      • Olivieri L.J.
      • Krieger A.
      • Thabit O.
      • Marshall M.B.
      • Yoo S.J.
      • Kim P.C.
      • Jonas R.A.
      • Nath D.S.
      Utilizing Three-dimensional printing technology to assess the feasibility of High-fidelity synthetic ventricular septal defect models for simulation in medical education.
      ; Javaid and Haleem,
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: a review.
      8CustomisationAM is an ideal solution for individualised patient data in medical as well as in orthopaedics

      Enables to create orthotic and prosthetic devices of patient-specific anatomy
      Kim et al.
      • Kim G.B.
      • Lee S.
      • Kim H.
      • Yang B.H.
      • Kim Y.H.
      • Kyung Y.S.
      • Kim C.S.
      • Choi S.H.
      • Kim B.J.
      • Ha H.
      • Kwon S.U.
      • Kim N.
      Three-dimensional printing: basic principles and applications in medicine and radiology.
      ; Bagaria et al.
      • Bagaria V.
      • Deshpande S.
      • Rasalkar D.D.
      • Bhawan A.K.
      • Paunipagar B.K.
      Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures.
      9Research and DevelopmentIn the orthopaedic field, the important direction of this technology is for the development of personalised prostheses and metallic implants

      Cobalt-chromium alloy, Ti6Al4V, and stainless steel types of material are used for manufacturing

      By using CAD file, AM technologies easily manufactured customised shape implants

      It makes more promising of research and development of orthopaedic implants
      Wong,
      • Wong K.C.
      3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics.
      ; Horn et al.
      • Horn T.J.
      • Harrysson O.L.A.
      • West H.A.
      • Little J.P.
      • Marcellin-Little D.J.
      Development of a patient-specific bone analog for the biomechanical evaluation of custom implants.
      10CostAM is efficient for low volume production which can create complex & customised components with lesser cost

      No expensive toolings are required and produce an implant with low waste

      As a result, there is a reduction of cost
      Kumar et al.
      • Kumar L.
      • Tanveer Q.
      • Kumar V.
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Developing low cost 3 d printer.
      ; Javaid and Haleem,
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: a review.
      11ComplexityConventional manufacturing technologies are not flexible to manufacture complex shape implant in less time

      AM technologies are available to print complicated shape product, implants, medical tools and instruments

      Thin and complicated shape scaffolds accurately follow the contour of bone are easily manufactured which is not previously possible
      Starosolski et al.
      • Starosolski Z.A.
      • Kan J.H.
      • Rosenfeld S.D.
      • Krishnamurthy R.
      • Annapragada A.
      Application of 3-d printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders.
      ; Schmauss et al.
      • Schmauss D.
      • Gerber N.
      • Sodian R.
      Three-dimensional printing of models for surgical planning in patients with primary cardiac tumors.
      12Improve Communication3D model printed by this technology enables to improve the communication between doctors/surgeon and patient

      It plays an important role to build effective communication for proper healthcare

      Doctors can now provide appropriate information to the patient

      Provide better understanding of treatment outcomes
      Javaid and Haleem,
      • Javaid M.
      • Haleem A.
      Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: a review.
      ;

      Tevanov et al.
      • Tevanov L.
      • Liciu E.
      • Chirila M.O.
      • Dusca A.
      • Ulici A.
      The use of 3D printing in improving patient-doctor relationship and malpractice prevention.
      ;
      AM has the potential to create an anatomic model so that patient anatomy can be examined easily by the surgeon in a concrete way as compared to 2D radiological images. AM can be used for comparing a normal anatomic model with a customised printed specially for complex shapes. A 3 D model of fractures bone model, provide a better understanding of the fracture to the surgeon as compared to the 2D/3D image on the screen. A 3D printed model can accurately show various features such as dislocation of the articular surfaces and joint fragmentations. In surgical planning, these elements aid in plate positioning and screw measurement. AM easily create 3D implants and the applications of these implants are used to repair a range of bone structures.

      8. Some significance development

      AM is used in many cases of orthopaedics to solve the present day challenges. Companies successfully implement this technology for the production of implants and surgical instruments because one human body differs from another. Some significant developments made by AM in orthopaedic are as follows:
      • Design and development of orthopaedic implants
      • Examination of defect bone geometry
      • Provides a better understanding to doctors about the patient
      • Provides a better idea for performing the operation
      • Reduces operation time
      • Manufactures exact fit bone implants
      • Produces lightweight implants with excellent surface quality
      • Print 3D model of multi-materials that represent a different section of bone, soft tissue and organ for a clear understanding of the patient body.
      • Increases the success rate of operation of the patient
      • Improvement in the quality of life of the patient.
      • Artificial bone produced that used to replaced defective areas.
      • Finally, surgeon's job becomes easy by the use patient fit implant and fulfils the requirement of highly individualised products with maximum flexibility.
      As compared to conventional method of implant production this technology has increasing benefits. By CAD data it produces patient-specific parts with high quality without any additional tool requirement. The application of this technology minimises unpleasant side effects and optimises patient treatment. AM technologies are expanding their capabilities to fulfil various challenges of optimisation of design and manufacturing performance. It continuously changes the way of orthopaedic product and become more competitive and efficient in a global marketplace.

      9. Discussion

      AM is an evolving technological platform that seems to have extensive applications in various areas of medicine. It can produce complex shape prototype with a wide variety of materials and also the implants of biocompatible materials that meet structural requirements. This technology makes surgeon job easier with minimum side effects which meet various challenges of orthopaedics. 3D printed model gives a better understanding of complex pathology and anatomy of patients that are suitable for surgical training. Technology has potential to make lightweight, durable, and geometrically complex objects. There is an improvement in the quality of life of the patient and efficiently solve the problem in Medical. Thus lowering the operation cost and improving cooperation between engineer, surgeon and the patient. In future, additive manufacturing will fulfil more challenges in orthopaedics because the human body is different; this technology creates implants that fit perfectly and quickly accepted by the body of the patient. The surgeons print an implant to practice before the surgery. One of the advantages of the 3D printed implant is that the shape and size match with the excised bone site and onto existing bone it lowering the pressure as compared to conventional implant.

      10. Limitations and future scope

      The main limitation of this technology is the conversion of scan data into STL format which is time-consuming. AM technologies, software and material, cost these technologies is high. The strength of part is another limitation of this technology.
      In future with the help of additive manufacturing applications, orthopaedic surgeons will embrace the knowledge. The applications of these technologies will helpful in clinical practices are used to develop the planning. Implant with inherent geometric freedom is the flexibility of this technology. In future, this technology will become perfect for personalised digital medicine. The application of patient customised 3D printed models of bone may become standard in surgical simulation, preoperative planning, implant development and intra-operative guidance. Its' application is for the reconstruction of large bone defects that optimally fit implant with proper dimensions before performing the surgery.

      11. Conclusion

      Additive manufacturing is used efficiently in orthopaedics for a replica of the bone which helps for various treatments of bones. The current status shows continuously increasing research work undertaken by additive manufacturing applications and challenges in the field of orthopaedic. This technique is incorporated in pre-surgical planning and clinical practice. Information of defected bone is collected easily by CT and MRI scan and printed by this technology. This provides a virtual model of patient anatomy that successfully provides planning about patient-specific orthopaedic procedures. AM is used for providing education to implant designing and pre-operative planning to training. For medical applications, this technology becomes prevalent and creates manufacturing flexibility. Additive manufacturing in orthopaedics will experience a rapid translation in future because due to its geometric freedom it fulfils various challenges. It successfully produces anatomic models for the planning of surgery, fabrication of complex custom implants for education and training. Technology tends to convert any idea or requirement into reality. Additive manufacturing technologies create an on-demand production of customised surgical instruments otherwise not available easily, due to its rare use and prohibitive cost. 3D printed bone, and biologic implants are used to orthopaedics restoration of function and original structure and have potential to design and develop tools for doctors and surgeons.

      Conflict of interest

      None.

      References

        • Javaid M.
        • Haleem A.
        Additive manufacturing applications in orthopaedics: a review.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.04.008
        • Wong K.C.
        3D-printed patient-specific applications in orthopedics.
        Orthop Res Rev. 2016; 8: 57-66
        • Vaish A.
        • Vaish R.
        3D printing and its applications in orthopedics.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2018.02.003
        • Javaid M.
        • Haleem A.
        Additive manufacturing applications in medical cases: a literature-based review.
        Alexandria J Med. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajme.2017.09.003
        • Vaishya R.
        • Lal H.
        Learn through innovation, research and publication.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016; 7: 219-220
        • Salmi M.
        • Tuomi J.
        • Paloheimo K.S.
        • Björkstrand R.
        • Paloheimo M.
        • Salo J.
        • Kontio R.
        • Mesimäki K.
        • Mäkitie A.A.
        Patient-specific reconstruction with 3D modeling and DMLS additive manufacturing.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2012; 18: 209-214
        • Javaid M.
        • Kumar L.
        • Kumar V.
        • Haleem A.
        Product design and development using polyjet Rapid prototyping technology.
        Control Theory Inf. 2015; 5: 12-19
        • Hoang D.
        • Perrault D.
        • Stevanovic M.
        • Ghiassi A.
        Surgical applications of three-dimensional printing: a review of the current literature & how to get started.
        Ann Transl Med. 2016; 4: 1-19
        • Horn T.J.
        • Harrysson O.L.A.
        • West H.A.
        • Little J.P.
        • Marcellin-Little D.J.
        Development of a patient-specific bone analog for the biomechanical evaluation of custom implants.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2014; 20: 41-49
        • Costello J.P.
        • Olivieri L.J.
        • Krieger A.
        • Thabit O.
        • Marshall M.B.
        • Yoo S.J.
        • Kim P.C.
        • Jonas R.A.
        • Nath D.S.
        Utilizing Three-dimensional printing technology to assess the feasibility of High-fidelity synthetic ventricular septal defect models for simulation in medical education.
        World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg. 2014; 5: 421-426
        • Lee V.
        • Singh G.
        • Trasatti J.P.
        • Bjornsson C.
        • Xu X.
        • Tran T.N.
        • Yoo S.S.
        • Dai G.
        • Karande P.
        Design and fabrication of human skin by three-dimensional bioprinting.
        Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2014; 20: 473-484
        • Zhou C.
        • Chen Y.
        • Yang Z.
        • Khoshnevis B.
        Digital material fabrication using mask image projection based stereolithography.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2013; 19: 153-165
        • Bens A.
        • Seitz H.
        • Bermes G.
        • Emons M.
        • Pansky A.
        • Roitzheim B.
        • Tobiasch E.
        • Tille C.
        Non toxic flexible photopolymers for medical stereolithography technology.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2007; 13: 38-47
        • Sing S.L.
        • Yeong W.Y.
        • Wiria F.E.
        • Tay B.Y.
        • Zhao Z.
        • Zhao L.
        • Tian Z.
        • Yang S.
        Direct selective laser sintering and melting of ceramics: a review.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2017; 23: 611-623
        • Deckers J.P.
        • Shahzad K.
        • Cardon L.
        • Rombouts M.
        • Vleugels J.
        • Kruth J.P.
        Shaping ceramics through indirect selective laser sintering.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2016; 22: 544-558
        • Wysocki B.
        • Maj P.
        • Sitek R.
        • Buhagiar P.
        • Kurzydłowski K.J.
        • Swieszkowski W.
        Laser and electron beam additive manufacturing methods of fabricating titanium bone implants.
        Appl Sci. 2017; 7: 1-20
        • Gibbons G.J.
        • Hansell R.G.
        Direct tool steel injection mould inserts through the arcam EBM free form fabrication process.
        Assembly Autom. 2005; 25: 300-305
        • Gale J.
        • Achuhan A.
        Application of ultrasonic peening during DMLS production of 316L stainless steel and its effect on material behavior.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2017; 23: 1185-1194
        • Kechagias J.
        An experimental investigation of the surface roughness of parts produced by LOM process.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2007; 13: 17-22
        • Park J.
        • Tari M.J.
        • Hahn H.T.
        Characterization of the laminated object manufacturing (LOM) process.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2000; 6: 36-50
        • Armillotta A.
        • Bianchi S.
        • Cavallaro M.
        • Minnella S.
        Edge quality in fused deposition modeling: II. experimental verification.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2017; 23: 686-695
        • Singh R.
        Some investigations for small sized product fabrication with FDM for plastic components.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2013; 19: 58-63
        • Guo Y.
        • Patanwala H.S.
        • Bognet B.
        • Ma A.W.K.
        Inkjet and inkjet-based 3D printing: connecting fluid properties and printing performance.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2017; 23: 562-576
        • Yang M.
        • Lv X.
        • Liu X.
        • Zhang J.
        Research on color 3D printing based on color adherence.
        Rapid Prototyp J. 2018; 24: 37-45
        • Mancanares C.G.
        • Zancul E.D.S.
        • Silva J.C.D.
        • Miguel P.A.C.
        Additive manufacturing process selection based on parts’ selection criteria.
        Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2015; 80: 1007-1014
        • Moore J.P.
        • Williams C.B.
        Fatigue properties of parts printed by PolyJet material jetting.
        Rapid Prototyping J. 2015; 21: 675-685
        • Kan C.W.
        • Yuen C.W.M.
        Digital ink-jet printing on textiles.
        Res J Textile Apparel. 2012; 16: 1-24
        • El-Wahab H.A.
        • El-Molla M.M.
        • Lin L.
        Preparation and characterisation of ink formulations for jet printing on nylon carpet.
        Res J Textile Apparel. 2012; 16: 24-33
        • Vaishya R.
        • Vijaya V.
        • Krishnan B.M.
        • Agarwala A.K.
        Fallacies of CT based component size prediction in total knee arthroplasty – are patient-specific instruments the answer?.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2017.11.001
        • Srivastava A.
        • Aggarwal A.N.
        • Mishra P.
        • Bhateja D.
        Femoral fracture acting as an “ominous masquerade’’ in a 7-year-old child.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016; 7: 27-29
        • Cai H.
        Application of 3D printing in orthopedics: status quo and opportunities in China.
        Ann Transl Med. 2015; (May 3): S12
        • Verma T.
        • Sharma A.
        • Sharma A.
        • Maini L.
        Customized iliac prosthesis for reconstruction in giant cell tumour: a unique treatment approach.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2016.10.001
        • Lal H.
        • Kumar L.
        • Kumar R.
        • Boruah T.
        • Jindal P.K.
        • Sabharwal V.K.
        Inserting pedicle screws in lumbar spondylolisthesis – the easy bone conserving way.
        J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2017; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2016.11.010
        • Morrison R.J.
        • Kashlan K.N.
        • Flanangan C.L.
        • Wright J.K.
        • Green G.E.
        • Hollister S.J.
        • Weatherwax K.J.
        Regulatory considerations in the design and manufacturing of implantable 3D-printed medical devices.
        Clin Transl Sci. 2015; 8: 594-600
        • Yap Y.L.
        • Tan Y.S.E.
        • Tan H.K.J.
        • Peh Z.K.
        • Low X.Y.
        • Yeong W.Y.
        • Tan C.S.H.
        • Laude H.
        3D printed bio-models for medical applications.
        Rapid Prototyping J. 2017; 23: 227-235
        • Chung K.J.
        • Hong-do Y.
        • Kim Y.T.
        • Yang I.
        • Park Y.W.
        • Kim H.N.
        Preshaping plates for minimally invasive fixation of calcaneal fractures using a real-size 3D-printed model as a preoperative and intraoperative tool.
        Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35: 1231-1236
        • Cohen A.
        • Laviv A.
        • Berman P.
        • Nashef R.
        • Abu-Tair J.
        Mandibular reconstruction using stereolithographic 3-dimensional printing modeling technology.
        Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2009; 108: 661-666
        • Rose A.S.
        • Webster C.E.
        • Harrysson O.L.
        • Formeister E.J.
        • Rawal R.B.
        • Iseli C.E.
        Pre-operative simulation of pediatric mastoid surgery with 3D-printed temporal bone models.
        Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015; 79: 740-744
        • Kim G.B.
        • Lee S.
        • Kim H.
        • Yang B.H.
        • Kim Y.H.
        • Kyung Y.S.
        • Kim C.S.
        • Choi S.H.
        • Kim B.J.
        • Ha H.
        • Kwon S.U.
        • Kim N.
        Three-dimensional printing: basic principles and applications in medicine and radiology.
        Korean J Radiol. 2016; 17: 182-197
        • Bagaria V.
        • Deshpande S.
        • Rasalkar D.D.
        • Bhawan A.K.
        • Paunipagar B.K.
        Use of rapid prototyping and three-dimensional reconstruction modeling in the management of complex fractures.
        Eur J Radiol. 2011; 80: 814-820
        • Kumar L.
        • Tanveer Q.
        • Kumar V.
        • Javaid M.
        • Haleem A.
        Developing low cost 3 d printer.
        Int J Appl Sci Eng Res. 2016; 5: 433-447
        • Starosolski Z.A.
        • Kan J.H.
        • Rosenfeld S.D.
        • Krishnamurthy R.
        • Annapragada A.
        Application of 3-d printing (rapid prototyping) for creating physical models of pediatric orthopedic disorders.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2014; 44: 216-221
        • Schmauss D.
        • Gerber N.
        • Sodian R.
        Three-dimensional printing of models for surgical planning in patients with primary cardiac tumors.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013; 145: 1407-1408
        • Tevanov L.
        • Liciu E.
        • Chirila M.O.
        • Dusca A.
        • Ulici A.
        The use of 3D printing in improving patient-doctor relationship and malpractice prevention.
        Rom J Leg Med. 2017; 25: 279-282