Vasovagal reactions in ultrasound guided musculoskeletal injections: A study of 2,462 procedures

Published:November 15, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2021.101706

      Abstract

      Objective

      to determine the rate of the vasovagal reaction (VVR) in ultrasound guided musculoskeletal injections (USGIs) and to investigate effect of injection site, age, and gender on this rate.

      Material and methods

      Retrospective analysis of all USGIs performed from the 1st of January 2019 to the 31st of December 2019 in single tertiary orthopaedic hospital. Two thousand four hundred and sixty two consecutive subjects undergoing USGIs were included. Statistical analysis used to determine the rate of the overall VVR in USGIs and to determine if site of the injection or joint injected has an effect on this rate as well as age and gender effect.

      Results

      Overall rate of VVR was 2.3% with shoulder and small joints of the hands and feet are more commonly affected than other sites. Females and patients aged younger than 65 years may be subjected to higher rate of VVR.

      Conclusions

      VVR has an overall low occurrence in USGI. The higher rate of VVR for shoulder and small joints of hands and feet procedures. Care should be taken when positioning a patient prior to the procedure to allow for a VVR in case it happens. VVR are more likely to occur in females and less likely in age more than 65 years.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
      Use these links to purchase access
      Purchase access to this article Visit ScienceDirect.
      If you are a member of the Delhi Orthopaedics Association (DOA), claim your access now.
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Graham D.
        • Kabler J.
        • Lunsford L.
        Vasovagal fainting: a diphasic response.
        Psychosom Med. 1961; 23: 493-507
        • Gilchrist P.T.
        • Ditto B.
        The effects of blood-draw and injection stimuli on the vasovagal response.
        Psychophysiology. 2012; 49: 815-820
        • Sheldon R.
        • Rose S.
        • Connolly S.
        • Ritchie D.
        • Koshman M.L.
        • Frenneaux M.
        Diagnostic criteria for vasovagal syncope based on a quantitative history.
        Eur Heart J. 2006; 27: 344-350
        • Kapoor W.N.
        Evaluation and management of the patient with syncope.
        J Am Med Assoc. 1992; 268: 2553-2560
        • Trentman T.L.
        • Rosenfeld D.M.
        • Seamans D.P.
        • Hentz J.G.
        • Stanek J.P.
        Vasovagal reactions and other complications of cervical vs. lumbar translaminar epidural steroid injections.
        Pain Pract. 2009; 9: 59-64
        • Wieling W.
        • Ganzeboom K.S.
        • Saul J.P.
        Reflex syncope in children and adolescents.
        Heart. 2004; 90: 1094-1100
        • Deacon B.
        • Abramowitz J.
        Fear of needles and vasovagal reactions among phlebotomy patients.
        J Anxiety Disord. 2006; 20: 946-960
        • Wu W.J.
        • Goldberg L.H.
        • Rubenzik M.K.
        • Zelickson B.R.
        Review of the evaluation and treatment of vasovagal reactions in outpatient procedures.
        Dermatol Surg. 2018 Dec; 44: 1483-1488
        • Kennedy D.J.
        • Schneider B.
        • Casey E.
        • et al.
        Vasovagal rates in flouroscopically guided interventional procedures: a study of over 8,000 injections.
        Pain Med. 2013; 14: 1854-1859
        • Wu Y.
        • He J.
        • Qi M.
        • et al.
        Analysis on related factors and nursing interventions of vasovagal syncope during ultrasound-guided PICC.
        Am J Nurs Sci. 2020; 9: 239-243
        • Philip J.
        • Sarkar R.S.
        • Jain N.
        A single-centre study of vasovagal reaction in blood donors: influence of age, sex, donation status, weight, total blood volume and volume of blood collected.
        Asian J Transfus Sci. 2014; 8: 43-46